Offered On-Campus Offered Online Post Recital Evaluation Basic Information About The Recital Recitalist's First Name Recitalist's Last Name Date of Recital (MM/DD/YYYY) Academic Year2023 - 2024 academic year2024-2025 academic year2025-2026 academic year2026-2027 academic year ClassificationMusic Major (Bachelor of Arts)Music Education Major (Bachelor of Science)Music Minor Type of RecitalJunior Recital (performance or voice)Senior Recital (for majors) or some junior minors Rate the Recital Musicianship and Attention to Detail - articulation, balance, dynamics, phrasing, tone.0 - A significant number of musical details overlooked; demonstrated a lack of musicianship overall1 - Numerous musical details overlooked; demonstrated satisfactory musicianship overall2 - Several musical details overlooked; demonstrated good musicianship overall3 - A minor number of musical details overlooked; demonstrated excellent musicianship overall4 - Outstanding attention to musical details; demonstrated outstanding musicianship overall Performance Practices0 - All of the pieces were played stylistically the same.1 - Three or more of the required musical eras were either omitted or not stylistically accurate.2 - Two of the required musical eras were either omitted or not stylistically accurate.3 - One of the required musical eras was either omitted or not stylistically accurate.4 - All of required musical eras were included and stylistically accurate. Rhythm (including steadiness of beat, control, and appropriate tempos) and Note Accuracy(including memory for piano and voice and intonation for voice and instrument).0 - Significant rhythm/tempo or note errors.1 - Numerous rhythm/tempo or note errors.2 - Several rhythm/tempo or note errors.3 - Minor rhythm/tempo or note errors.4 - Consistently Outstanding. Technique0 - Unable to demonstrate instrument specific technique.1 - Demonstrated limited instrument specific technique.2 - Demonstrated adequate instrument specific technique.3 - Demonstrated a more than adequate level of instrument specific technique.4 - Demonstrated accomplished instrument specific technique. Ensemble with accompanist/duo partner, etc.0 - Significant problems with balance and ensemble.1 - Numerous problems with balance and ensemble.2 - Normal collegiate level interaction and balance with accompanist.3 - Exceptional interaction and balance with accompanist.4 - Outstanding interaction and balance with accompanist. Poise0 - Unable to deal with performance anxiety.1 - Demonstrated limited ability to deal with performance anxiety.2 - Demonstrated adequate ability to deal with performance anxiety.3 - Demonstrated excellent poise.4 - Demonstrated outstanding poise. Level of Repertoire0 - Considerably below the classification’s level as outlined in the Music Handbook.1 - Slightly below the classification’s level as outlined in the Music Handbook.2 - At classification’s level as outlined in the Music Handbook.3 - Slightly above the classification’s level as outlined in the Music Handbook.4 - Considerably above the classification’s level as outlined in the Music Handbook. Recital Length0 - Significantly too long or too short.2 - Slightly too long or too short.4 - Adhered to the length requirements as outlined in the Music Dep. handbook. Aptitude / Potential versus Achievement0 - The performance was significantly inferior to the student’s potential.2 - The performance was slightly inferior to the student’s potential.4 - The performance accurately reflected the student’s capability. Faculty Comments (Note: Students will see this.) Score 33-36 = Exceptional (A+) *** 29-32 = Excellent (A) *** 25-28 = Good (B) *** 19-24 = Satisfactory (C) *** 13-18 = Needs Improvement (D) Assessing Faculty's NamePlease select... Bonnema, Andrew Brown, David Brown, Ruth Brus, June Ledgerwood, David Ruffin, Carol Steinbart, Melody Tschida, Janet Other Bachorik, Doug Bachorik, Ruth reCAPTCHA helps prevent automated form spam. The submit button will be disabled until you complete the CAPTCHA.
